aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/mainwindow.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDanilo M. <danix@danix.xyz>2026-08-04 11:36:16 +0200
committerDanilo M. <danix@danix.xyz>2026-08-04 12:54:54 +0200
commit0a160651cfb9a0f580bcc446941058a339e55643 (patch)
tree911d60baf92426f5f32a662d5e9ebf6e72ae0cf2 /src/mainwindow.cpp
parent4574a6e8d1253c0a70972f0c6e4d13d528ea6420 (diff)
downloadqtmaildir-0a160651cfb9a0f580bcc446941058a339e55643.tar.gz
qtmaildir-0a160651cfb9a0f580bcc446941058a339e55643.zip
feat(tags): add an Edit tags dialog on Ctrl+T
Five hardcoded tags were the only ones reachable from the UI: archive, delete, spam, flag and toggle_unread. For an application whose purpose is organising mail by tag, applying any other one meant leaving for a terminal. Item 26 of the usability backlog, raised by the user asking how to add a tag and finding they could not. One dialog rather than separate add and remove actions, at the user's choice: filing something under a new tag while dropping inbox is one thought, not two. Type tags to add or remove, comma separated, or clear a checkbox to drop a tag already on the selection without retyping its name. Both fields complete against the tag list MainWindow already holds for the query completer. Completion is a guard against typing shoppping beside shopping, never a whitelist: inventing a tag is the entire point, so any valid name goes through whether or not it exists yet. Tri-state checkboxes carry the multi-thread case, and are where the risk is. A tag on some selected threads shows partially checked, and leaving it alone changes nothing; the opposite reading would silently tag threads the user never looked at. A tag already on every thread and left checked is likewise not a change and is not sent as one. Tag names are validated before anything is applied, through a free function so the rules are testable on their own. Empty, a leading dash (notmuch's CLI reads it as removal, making such a tag a trap), whitespace and control characters are refused by name and reason. Nothing is applied until the whole set passes, since the user cannot tell which half of a partial change landed. TagDialog is pure UI: handed the vocabulary and the current state, returning two lists, contacting no worker. That is what lets its fifteen tests run without a notmuch database. Integration is a single call to the existing tagSelected(), so undo, the optimistic model update, the combined multi-row query and the completer refresh for a brand-new tag all come for free. One test assumption was wrong and the code was right: a case asserted that QStringLiteral("null\0byte") truncates at the null and reads as empty. It does not, so the null is caught as a control character. The test was corrected rather than the validator. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mainwindow.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/mainwindow.cpp41
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/mainwindow.cpp b/src/mainwindow.cpp
index d8fba3e..000be85 100644
--- a/src/mainwindow.cpp
+++ b/src/mainwindow.cpp
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
#include "notmuchworker.h"
#include "querycompleter.h"
#include "tagchip.h"
+#include "tagdialog.h"
#include "threadlistmodel.h"
#include "version.h"
@@ -548,6 +549,10 @@ void MainWindow::registerActions()
else
tagSelected({ QStringLiteral("unread") }, {}, tr("Mark unread"));
});
+ addAction(QStringLiteral("edit_tags"), tr("Edit &tags..."),
+ tr("Add or remove any tag on the selected threads"), [this]() {
+ editTagsOnSelection();
+ });
addAction(QStringLiteral("toggle_html"), tr("Toggle &HTML"),
tr("Switch the thread between HTML and plain text"), [this]() {
m_messageView->toggleHtml();
@@ -634,6 +639,7 @@ void MainWindow::buildMenus()
messageMenu->addAction(m_actions.value(QStringLiteral("spam")));
messageMenu->addSeparator();
messageMenu->addAction(m_actions.value(QStringLiteral("toggle_unread")));
+ messageMenu->addAction(m_actions.value(QStringLiteral("edit_tags")));
messageMenu->addAction(m_actions.value(QStringLiteral("flag")));
auto *viewMenu = menuBar()->addMenu(tr("&View"));
@@ -1152,6 +1158,41 @@ void MainWindow::markCurrentThreadRead()
tr("Mark read"));
}
+void MainWindow::editTagsOnSelection()
+{
+ const QModelIndexList rows =
+ m_threadView->selectionModel()->selectedRows();
+ if (rows.isEmpty()) {
+ m_statusLabel->setText(tr("Select a thread first"));
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // How many of the selected threads carry each tag, which is what tells a
+ // tag that is on all of them from one that is on some.
+ QHash<QString, int> counts;
+ for (const QModelIndex &index : rows) {
+ const ThreadSummary thread = m_model->threadAt(index.row());
+ for (const QString &tag : thread.tags)
+ counts[tag] += 1;
+ }
+
+ // m_knownTags is the same list the query completer uses, so the dialog
+ // offers every tag in the database without a round trip.
+ TagDialog dialog(m_knownTags, counts, rows.size(), this);
+ if (dialog.exec() != QDialog::Accepted)
+ return;
+
+ const QStringList add = dialog.tagsToAdd();
+ const QStringList remove = dialog.tagsToRemove();
+ if (add.isEmpty() && remove.isEmpty())
+ return; // Applied with nothing changed.
+
+ // Straight through tagSelected(), so this inherits undo, the optimistic
+ // model update, the one-query multi-row resolution, and the completer
+ // refresh for a tag that did not exist before.
+ tagSelected(add, remove, tr("Edit tags"));
+}
+
void MainWindow::tagSelected(const QStringList &add, const QStringList &remove,
const QString &description)
{