feat: number each build of a dev tree

The version alone cannot tell one build of an unreleased X.Y.Z from
another, and the user rebuilds and hand-tests unreleased builds daily.
They chose a counter over a git description: what they want to know is
that the binary is newer than the one they were running, not which
commit it came from.

QTMAILDIR_BUILD_NUMBER is a cmake option, ON by default, that runs
cmake/BuildNumber.cmake as a build step to increment a counter and write
buildnumber.h. It had to be a build step: configure_file runs once per
cmake run, so a counter interpolated into version.h.in would sit still
across exactly the rebuilds this exists to distinguish, which is why
version.h.in includes a second generated header rather than carrying the
number itself.

Two macros, and the split is load-bearing. QTMAILDIR_VERSION stays a
clean X.Y.Z and keeps the window title, applicationVersion and anything
that might ever compare versions; QTMAILDIR_VERSION_DISPLAY carries the
number and goes to the three surfaces the user picked, --version and
--help, the About dialog, and the placeholder pane. The window title was
offered and declined, since the number would then be in every
screenshot.

The counter lives in the build directory and is not tracked, so it
cannot conflict on a pull or leave the tree dirty; a fresh build
directory restarts at 1, which is honest, because it is a different
build tree. A release passes -DQTMAILDIR_BUILD_NUMBER=OFF and the header
is written empty. The SlackBuild in the my-slackbuilds repo needs that
flag and is a separate commit there.

Verified by running it, since none of this is reachable from a C++ test:
three consecutive builds reported build 2, 3 and 4, and a separate
Release configure with the option OFF reported a clean 0.27.0. Passing
the flag to a tree that does not have the option yet is an unused-cli
warning and exit 0, so the SlackBuild change is safe before 0.28.0
ships. The suite is 37 of 38, the one failure being item 136 on an
unrelated path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HFuRPtzFrSxCQjFk6tq7gD

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 46 deletions

diff --git a/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-03-post-0.1.0-usability.md b/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-03-post-0.1.0-usability.md
index 6c29fe0..3cdc71a 100644
--- a/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-03-post-0.1.0-usability.md
+++ b/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-03-post-0.1.0-usability.md
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ taking that too literally.
 | 164 | A draft this application saved keeps `inbox` | defect | S | open, 2026-08-25, **cause corrected 2026-08-25**. The first diagnosis blamed a missing drafts helper and was WRONG: `NOT_ARRIVALS` in `qtmaildirconf.py` is `("sent", "drafts")`, the folder list includes every account's drafts folder, and `notmuch count` confirms the carve-out query MATCHES the affected draft. The carve-out is scoped to `tag:new`, and the draft carries `inbox` while `tag:new` is 0, so it was never in scope when the hook ran. Measured separately: an mbsync-style rename does NOT re-add `new.tags`, so the retag theory is out too. What remains unestablished is WHICH pass tagged it; establish that before writing code |
 | 165 | A draft gets a new Message-ID on every autosave | enhancement | ? | open, 2026-08-25, found while hand-testing 163 and 164. `MessageBuilder::build()` generates an id unconditionally and every autosave calls it, so each revision is a distinct MESSAGE to notmuch and to the server rather than a new version of one. Invisible while the file is replaced correctly, which item 163's fix restores; it is what turned that fork into two messages rather than one duplicated file. Needs a DECISION on what a draft's identity is before any code: a stable id reused at send, a stable id discarded at send, or the status quo. Neither `ComposeContext` nor `OutgoingMessage` has a field to carry an id, so it is not a changed call site |
 | 166 | Mail you send to your own other account loses `inbox` | defect | S | open, found 2026-08-25. Wholly this repo's: the hooks live in `assets/hooks/` with their own suites, and the live `post-new` symlinks to them |
-| 167 | No way to tell one build of an unreleased version from another | enhancement | XS | open, found 2026-08-25 from the notes, unrecorded until now. `src/version.h.in` interpolates `PROJECT_VERSION` alone, so every build between two releases reports the same string and a rebuilt binary cannot be told from the one it replaced. The user runs unreleased builds daily, which is when it matters. Needs a DECISION on the source: the git describe/short hash (accurate, needs the build to re-run cmake to pick up a new commit) or a monotonic counter (always moves, means nothing on its own) |
+| 167 | No way to tell one build of an unreleased version from another | enhancement | XS | **done 2026-08-25**, unreleased. The user chose a counter over a git description: `QTMAILDIR_BUILD_NUMBER`, a cmake option ON by default, increments a counter in the BUILD directory on every build and writes `buildnumber.h`. `QTMAILDIR_VERSION_DISPLAY` carries it; `QTMAILDIR_VERSION` stays clean and is what the window title, `applicationVersion` and the release procedure use |
 
 Sizes are rough: XS under an hour, S a sitting, M a session.
 
@@ -1519,48 +1519,3 @@ id and a draft of a reply carries both.
 - Item 163's fix stands on its own and this does not block it: the file is
   replaced correctly now, so the fork this would have mitigated no longer
   happens by that route.
-
-## 167. No way to tell one build of an unreleased version from another
-
-**Observed (user, from the notes):** "we should add a dev build number to be
-pushed everytime we rebuild after a fix, so that I can verify if I'm in the
-correct app version." The note has sat unrecorded through several sessions;
-the 2026-08-25 reconciliation is the first to pick it up.
-
-**Cause (verified in the code, 2026-08-25.)** The version lives in exactly one
-place, `project(qtmaildir VERSION ...)`, and `src/version.h.in` interpolates
-`@PROJECT_VERSION@` and nothing else. That is correct for a release and says
-nothing between two of them: the string moves only when the release procedure
-bumps it, so every rebuild of `0.27.0` reports `0.27.0`. The status table above
-shows why it bites in practice, since most closed items since 0.27.0 read
-"unreleased" and the user hand-tests each one against a binary they rebuilt
-themselves.
-
-Both surfaces that show the version take it from the same macro, so whatever is
-added reaches them at once: the window title (`mainwindow.cpp:939`), the About
-dialog (`mainwindow.cpp:2449`), the placeholder pane (`messageview.cpp:547`),
-`--version` and `--help` (`main.cpp`).
-
-**Approach.** Needs a DECISION before any code, because the two candidates fail
-in opposite directions.
-
-A git description (`git describe --always --dirty`, or the short hash) is
-accurate and self-explaining: it names the commit the binary was built from, and
-a reviewer can check out exactly that. Its cost is that CMake computes it at
-CONFIGURE time, so a build after a new commit reports the previous hash unless
-the configure step is made to re-run, which is a custom command with a dependency
-on `.git/HEAD` and the packed refs, and is the part that usually ships subtly
-wrong.
-
-A monotonic counter always moves and needs no git, but it means nothing on its
-own: build 412 does not say which fix is in it, and it differs between the user's
-machine and any other, so it cannot be quoted in a report.
-
-**Constraints.** A release build must keep printing a clean `X.Y.Z`, since the
-SlackBuild in the `my-slackbuilds` repo builds from the release tarball where
-there is no git checkout at all, and the release procedure checks
-`./build/src/qtmaildir --version`. Whatever is added is therefore an addition to
-the string in a dev build and absent in a release one, not a change to the
-version itself.
-
-**Size: XS** once the decision is made.