Record upscaler test results and imajev prompt rule

Three test images (clean portrait, landscape, noisy phone JPEG) at 4x
picked the foolhardy 4x model for clean photos, RealESRGAN_x4plus for
degraded ones and the anime model for art. The suggestion prompt must
weigh source quality, since imajev chose a detail model for the noisy
photo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-10-30-upscale-qt-design.md b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-10-30-upscale-qt-design.md
index 8db80a5..ffcb5da 100644
--- a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-10-30-upscale-qt-design.md
+++ b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-10-30-upscale-qt-design.md
@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@ job. Batch mode later adds UI over the same list.
 2. If imajev is configured, run
    `llama-mtmd-cli -m <model> --mmproj <mmproj> --image <src> -p <prompt>`,
    the prompt listing the upscaler filenames and asking for exactly one back.
+   The prompt also tells it to weigh source quality (noise, compression,
+   blur) and not only the subject: in testing it picked a detail model for
+   a noisy phone photo where a denoising one did far better. If that keeps
+   happening, add an optional `models.txt` (filename plus one-line note)
+   fed into the prompt.
    The answer is matched to a filename (exact filename, then stem, then
    case-insensitive substring); a match preselects the dropdown and the
    status bar says "imajev suggests X". No match or failure: dropdown