| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Opening the tagging rules dialog and pressing Save destroyed the first
rule in the list, without any editing. The rule lost its query and its
tags, then vanished entirely on the next load, since a rule with an empty
query is dropped as malformed.
Reproduced against the released tag rather than the branch, in a
throwaway worktree at 9585674 with a two-rule fixture: constructing the
dialog and running its save path left one rule of two.
onSelectionChanged blocked signals for the note widget only, while
m_enabled::toggled two lines later reached applyEditsToCurrentRule, which
writes every field from widgets the loader has not filled yet. The
existing comment there shows the hazard was known for one widget and not
extended to the other.
The fix landed with the builder work: the reloading flag now covers the
whole load, and switchingRulesDoesNotLeakRowsBetweenThem is the
regression test, verified by mutation to fail without the guard.
The live rules file had one casualty, the account rule sitting first in
the list, with both its query and its tags empty while every sibling was
intact. Restored from the shell backup that the earlier migration kept
and verified through mailctl's own reader. The rule had stopped tagging,
but only one message had arrived meanwhile; that message is now tagged
and the account is complete again at 14969 of 14969.
|
|
Selecting a rule now parses its stored query and rebuilds the builder
rows from it, and a row edit compiles back onto the query line and into
the working copy.
Populating the form was already able to write the rule just loaded over
whichever rule is current: m_enabled's toggled runs
applyEditsToCurrentRule while m_query still holds the previous rule's
text, which emptied the first rule's query on open. The existing
m_reloading guard now covers the whole load rather than one signal
blocker on the note, which also covers the combo boxes rebuildRows
populates.
|
|
|
|
Edits land on a working copy and reach the file only on Save. The
dialog never opens a notmuch database of its own: it publishes the
queries it wants counted and MainWindow runs them through the worker,
because the worker owns the only handle.
Two departures from the drafted version, both of which lost edits.
QPlainTextEdit has no editingFinished, so the note reached the working
copy only for whichever row was current at Save; it is driven from
textChanged instead, with the selection handler blocking the signal so
loading a rule cannot write itself back over the one now current. And
reloadList()'s setCurrentItem emits currentItemChanged, so New and Copy
repopulated the form from m_working before the pending edit had been
flushed into it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
