| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Four faults from the first hand test, two of them behavioural.
An expander that opened onto nothing. setThreadMessages kept only nodes with
depth > 0, and notmuch_thread_get_toplevel_messages returns every message at
depth 0 when a thread carries no usable In-Reply-To, so a flat thread
contributed no children while its card still advertised the count. Measured in
the user's database: of 396 inbox threads three are flat, one of them nine
messages long, and every two-message thread of that kind was affected, which is
exactly why the fault looked like "the expander only works with more than one
reply". The rule is now position, not depth: every message except the first,
which is the root card itself. That is also the correct rule rather than a
workaround, since the row under the root is the second message however notmuch
chose to nest it.
The thread's first message was unreachable. Selecting a root card loaded the
whole thread, so the pane showed every message with only the last expanded, and
no row in the list offered the first one: the reply rows are messages two
onward. The root card now renders its own message, which is what the card
already claims to be. It keeps its thread id, unlike the message-row path, so
mark-read and the tag-change repaint still work; that is asserted, because
clearing it is the obvious way to write this and silently disables both. Before
the replies are loaded the model has no first message to name and the whole
thread stays the honest answer.
Dates ignored the locale. One hardcoded "yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm" produced a US-looking
format on an Italian desktop; QLocale::system() now formats it, and the width
reserved for the date comes from the same function so a longer locale cannot
clip.
The expander was a bare number on the card's own background. It is a pill now,
carrying "3 replies" (and "1 reply", singular), sized from the label actually
drawn and measured in both glyph states so it does not resize under the pointer
on click. Its fill is blended from Text toward Base rather than taken from
QPalette::Button, which is #2b2b2b against a Base of #2b2b2b on the user's
theme: byte identical, so the pill was invisible. A theme may make any two roles
equal; a blend is defined against the surface it sits on and cannot collide with
it. Checked by rendering both a dark and a light palette and looking.
|
|
Five columns answered through Qt::DisplayRole; one column cannot, and a card
needs every field at once, so each gets its own role. Qt::DisplayRole keeps
answering the subject, which is what keyboard search and accessibility read.
Three things change shape rather than moving. DateRole hands over the QDateTime
itself, since the card decides how much of a date it has room for and a
pre-formatted string takes that decision away from the delegate. The subject
loses its "(3)" message-count suffix, which the reply count on line 2 now
states. And the two per-column tooltips become one card-wide tooltip, because
the marks no longer have columns of their own to hover.
The build is red at this commit: the view and the delegates still name the
deleted Column enumerators and are rewritten in the commits that follow.
|
|
A reply card shows only these. The alternative, a reply's full tag set, was
rejected on measurement rather than taste: in the user's database 7 of 48691
messages carry unread and 75 carry flagged, both already drawn another way, and
every other tag is applied per thread and identical on all its messages. Full
sets would repeat the thread's chips down the whole expansion, which is the
striping the row-wide strip was built to avoid.
|
|
tagSelected resolved rows to threads with threadAt(index.row()), which is wrong
for a message row: a child's row number indexes its siblings, so acting on a
reply tagged whichever thread sat at that position in the list. It now routes
through ThreadListModel::scopeFor, and a message row's change is sent as message
ids down applyTags with its own MessageTagCommand for undo.
MessageTagCommand stores message ids where ThreadTagCommand stores thread ids,
and that difference is the point rather than an inconsistency: re-resolving the
thread on undo would restore tags across every sibling the action never touched.
sendMessageTagChange deliberately skips the optimistic model update.
applyTagChange is keyed by thread and would repaint the whole row as though
every message in it had changed, which for a one-message edit is a lie the user
watches correct itself on the next query. It keeps the two things that are NOT
optional: the edited-account set, resolved through the containing thread since
the account is a property of the thread, and holding the edit when a sync holds
notmuch's write lock, since the worker's read-write open blocks rather than
failing.
The scope is now stated before an action and after it, naming both the message
count and whether a whole thread went. This is what stands in for the
confirmation dialog CLAUDE.md rules out: undo is the safety net, and undo is
only usable if the user can tell that something larger than they meant has just
happened. Selecting a single message reports no count at all, since reading one
message is not a bulk action.
A mutation that routed message rows down the thread path SURVIVED the whole
suite: undo depth and status text are identical either way while every sibling
gets tagged. anActionOnAMessageRowTagsThatMessageNotTheThread exists because
that gap was found, and asserts on the ids actually sent.
anActionOnAThreadRowSaysItHitTheWholeThread reads the status bar BEFORE draining
the event loop. This binary has no worker, backlog item 36, so the queued write
reaches a database that has never heard of the thread and answers with
errorOccurred, which overwrites the status bar: draining first asserts on that
error and fails against correct code.
|
|
Indentation alone still read as a table, which was the user's original
complaint about the whole item. Three cues now say the rows belong to the
thread above them: a spine down the left of the expanded block with a stub out
to each reply, a background tint, and text a size down and undimmed only when
unread.
Both colours are mixed from the palette rather than fixed, the same rule
readColour follows: a tint that reads as grouping on a light theme is invisible
or muddy on a dark one. The tint is deliberately near the threshold of noticing,
since it sits beside the deleted and spam fills, which carry real meaning and
must stay the loudest thing in the list.
The spine is accumulated across the visible reply rows and drawn once after the
loop. Drawn per row it left a gap at every row boundary and read as a column of
dashes rather than as the structure holding the block together.
Two bugs fixed here, both mine, both from the previous commit:
Clicking the expander did nothing. setRootIsDecorated(false), needed to stop
the style painting its own indicator under ours, also removed the style's hit
area, so the glyph rendered perfectly and was inert. ThreadListView handles the
press itself now, over the strip the delegate reserves, leaving the rest of the
subject cell to select the row.
Every click then expanded rather than toggling, because isExpanded and
setExpanded are keyed on column 0 and were being asked about the subject-column
index, which always answers false.
Visible, clickable and toggling are three separate properties and a test for
one passes against the other two being broken: the pixel test proved the
triangle was drawn while it could not be clicked, and the first click test
proved it opened while it could never close. The test now clicks twice and
asserts open then closed.
replyRowsKeepTheirTextUnderTheThreadLine covers the other trap. paintEvent runs
AFTER the cells, so the first version of the tint filled the whole reply row and
erased the sender and subject the delegate had just drawn: zero surviving text
pixels, a block of blank tinted rows. The fill and the stub stay in the band
below the text, where the tag strip lives on thread rows.
|
|
Both were reported from the running application after the previous commit
claimed them working, and the tests that passed could not see either fault.
The expander took four attempts, each of which looked right in code:
- QTreeView::drawBranches is the documented hook and does not work here. It
runs BEFORE the row's cells, so with the expander on a content column the
delegate's own background paints over it. A 60-pixel triangle survived as
8, indistinguishable from the theme's near-invisible dot.
- Sizing the glyph from the row rather than the branch rect put most of it
outside that rect.
- Moving it into SubjectDelegate but calling it from only the no-chip branch
left every real row without one, since every real row has an account chip
and takes the other branch.
It is now drawn by the delegate, which owns the cell and paints after the
background, from both branches, with setRootIsDecorated(false) so the style
does not draw its dot underneath.
The indent was 20px and invisible for a reason the geometry could not show: a
thread row draws an account chip before its subject and a reply row does not, so
a reply's text already starts about a chip's width LEFT of its thread's. The
indent has to beat that before any nesting reads at all, hence 72px.
The indent test asserted on visualRect, which was correctly indented the whole
time, and so passed against a build with no visible nesting. It now measures
where the TEXT lands, accounting for the chip, and fails at 20px. The new
expander test counts painted pixels of the glyph colour against a control row
with no replies, and fails when the call is dropped from either branch.
|
|
Replies are fetched on expansion rather than with the query: walking the reply
tree of every thread in a 10k-thread result would cost more than the query and
almost none of it would be looked at.
hasChildren is what makes that lazy loading work, and its absence would have
shipped the feature unreachable. rowCount is 0 until the worker has walked the
thread, so a view left to infer the expander from rowCount alone draws none, the
user can never expand, and the replies are never requested. It answers from the
summary's totalCount before loading and from the children afterwards, so a
thread whose count included duplicates stops offering an expander that opens
onto nothing.
onThreadTreeLoaded reads the thread id from the reply rather than remembering it
from the request. Two expansions can be in flight at once, and pairing them by
order would attach one thread's replies to the other.
|
|
ActionScope is what an action is about to touch, resolved from the selection in
one place so no call site reinvents the mapping. A thread root contributes the
whole thread, a message row contributes one message, and messageCount is what
the status bar reports.
The count comes from totalCount, not from the loaded children. A thread that was
never expanded still has all of its messages, and counting only the rows that
happen to be on screen would understate what the action does: mutation-checked,
and the wrong version reports 1 message where 7 are about to be tagged.
A mixed selection is honoured as given rather than escalated to thread scope or
narrowed to message scope. Silently widening it would defeat the reason the
scope is shown at all.
|
|
setThreadMessages drops the depth-0 message: it is the thread's first message
and the root row already stands for it. Keeping it would show a thread of seven
as one root and seven children, contradicting the reply count the row
advertises. Calling again replaces rather than appends, so a thread reloaded
after a sync does not list its replies twice.
A message row reports its own sender and subject, not the thread's. That is the
mistake worth guarding: the thread's author summary usually contains the first
sender too, so reading it renders something plausible for the root's own reply
and wrong for every other one. Mutation-checked, and the wrong version returns
'Alice' where 'Bob' belongs.
Child rows carry no tag pills. The strip is a row-wide band of the thread's
tags; one under each reply would stripe the list and repeat identical tags down
the expansion.
|
|
A table cannot indent or expand, so message rows need a tree. This task changes
only the base class and the index plumbing: no children are produced yet, so the
30 pre-existing tests in test_threadlistmodel are the regression net proving a
thread row still behaves exactly as it did, and QAbstractItemModelTester checks
the index/parent round trip a hand-written assertion would miss.
Two things the table version could leave wrong and a tree cannot. columnCount
returned 0 for a valid parent, which would give message rows no columns and
render them blank. And rowCount now answers only for column 0, since a tree
takes one set of children per row and offering them under every column draws an
expander in each.
The model stays two levels deep even though replies carry a reply depth of their
own. The visual nesting past the first level comes from that depth, not from
further parent-child structure, so no index calculation has to recurse.
|
|
Items 56 and 57, done together because both touch the action registry.
56. The complaint was inconsistency, not absence: eight of twenty-four
actions had themed icons, so two adjacent entries in one menu disagreed
and the toolbar laid out an empty slot for the other sixteen. The
themeIcons table now covers them all. The fifteen names added were
probed against a live icon theme first rather than taken from the
freedesktop spec on faith, and the existing null-icon guard still lets a
theme that lacks one fall back to text.
The second half of the note asked that buttons honour the desktop's
"Icon only" setting. They could not: the hardcoded setToolButtonStyle
overrode it whatever the user had chosen. It now reads
SH_ToolButtonStyle. Dropping the call entirely was tried and rejected,
since a bare QToolBar defaults to ToolButtonIconOnly rather than to the
platform hint, which ignores the setting just as thoroughly the other
way. This is a visible change: on a desktop set to "Icon only" the
toolbar now shows icons without text.
57. "Important" over "Starred", the user's pick; the Message menu
already has "Mark &spam", so "Starred" would have needed an accelerator
from inside the word. Changed the action text, its status tip, the undo
description and the star column's tooltip, which still read "Flagged".
The tag stays `flagged`. It is wire format that neomutt, the user's
saved queries and ThreadSummary::isFlagged() all read, and following the
label through to the tag would rewrite the mail store and desynchronise
every other tool over the same Maildir. The action name stays `flag`
too, since that is the key users write in [keys].
Four tests. everyActionCarriesAnIcon names every action missing one and
guards against passing on an empty list; it reported all sixteen before
the change. theImportantActionStillWritesTheFlaggedTag asserts on the
tag the model actually received, and mutating it to `important` fails
that test plus two pre-existing held-edit tests.
Also adds the changelog entry for the cron-sync indicator fix, which the
commit that made it omitted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
A sync ran mbsync -a regardless of what changed, so tagging mail in one
account fetched all of them. The account set was not a parameter anywhere
on the path: MailSync::start() took no arguments and the script hardcoded
-a, so nothing between a tag edit and mbsync carried which account changed.
Track which accounts have edits and pass their mbsync channels through to
the script, which now takes channel names and falls back to -a when given
none. An empty set means all accounts, per the request: a sync with nothing
pending is a fetch, and narrowing that to wherever the last edit landed
would quietly stop collecting mail everywhere else.
The channel is a new optional per-account key rather than the section key.
The two names genuinely diverge, because a QSettings section key may carry
dots that the channel does not, and mbsync treats an unknown channel as
fatal rather than skipping it, so key-as-channel would fail those accounts'
syncs outright rather than degrade. It defaults to the key, so accounts
whose two names already agree need no config change.
The edited-account set is deliberately not netted the way the pending-edit
map is: that map tracks the index, where a tag removed and re-added leaves
nothing outstanding, while this tracks the mail store, where both writes
have already renamed files that mbsync still has to propagate. It is also
snapshotted before flushHeldEdits(), which inserts into it synchronously
rather than on a queued reply, so a successful sync cannot clear accounts
whose edits it never carried.
Closes item 49.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
The thread list was uniform and cramped: every row one line tall, with
nothing to say what a thread was about before opening it. Rows are now
roughly double height, carrying a strip of tag chips beneath the text,
with alternating row colours and a star column for flagged threads
beside the existing paperclip.
The strip is painted by the VIEW rather than by a delegate, which is
why ThreadListView exists. A delegate is handed one cell's rectangle
and cannot paint outside its column, so a strip drawn from the subject
column stops at that column's edge, losing the last tags of a
well-tagged thread, and starts at its left edge, putting the chips
under the subject instead of under the row.
Tags the row already shows another way are left out: inbox as
structure, unread as the dimming, flagged as the star, attachment as
the paperclip, and the account as the chip in the subject cell. Sorted,
since notmuch's order is not guaranteed stable and a row whose chips
reordered between repaints would flicker.
Six defects were introduced and fixed on the way here, all of them one
consequence: a QTableView paints per cell, and a row-wide strip is not
a cell. SubjectDelegate installed view-wide drew the account chip into
every column, since AccountLabelRole belongs to the row; it is split
into RowStyleDelegate for every column and SubjectDelegate for the
subject alone, with a Q_ASSERT guarding that. Row height returned from
sizeHint did nothing, because a table takes one height per row. The
strip painted from x=0 over the marker columns, via a protected
viewportMargins() that returns 0. Measuring the text band and the strip
with one font put the pills over the date. Alternating colours and the
selection are per-cell too, so the band showed bare viewport background
until the view filled it, honouring the model's own BackgroundRole
first so a deleted row is not cut in half. And that fill spanned the
full width, cutting the centred marker glyphs at their midpoint.
Closes item 5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
Bold was unread's only cue, and it renders identically to regular on the
user's system: confirmed by eye against a bare QTableView holding a
plain QStandardItemModel, with no code from this project involved. The
fault is in Qt or fontconfig, below this application, and nothing in the
model could ever have reached it. Read and unread mail looked exactly
alike.
The emphasis is inverted instead. Unread rows keep the palette's own
text colour and read rows are dimmed toward the background, so the cue
rides on Qt::ForegroundRole, which the delegate already honours, and
costs no column. It also suits the real ratio, measured at 99 unread
against 4220 read: dimming the bulk is calmer than highlighting it. The
dim colour is derived from the palette, never hardcoded, per the rule
item 12 established. Bold is kept for systems where it works, but
nothing depends on it now.
That exposed a second defect, visible the moment it shipped. Qt resolves
ForegroundRole into the palette and then prefers it over
HighlightedText, so a model-supplied colour wins on a SELECTED row too.
The dim is blended against the unselected background, so a selected read
row painted grey on the selection colour, near unreadable.
SubjectDelegate::initStyleOption now reverses that, and the delegate is
installed view-wide rather than on the subject column alone, so every
column gets the same handling instead of three of them keeping Qt's
ordering.
The guarding tests state the property rather than the mechanism: strip
the font from the model's answer and the two states must still differ.
A test asserting only that bold is set passes on a system where bold
paints like regular, which is exactly how this survived. The selection
test renders two rows identical but for the unread tag, selects both,
and requires zero differing pixels.
Part of item 5; the density work and the star column remain.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
An attachment was only discoverable by opening the thread. A narrow
leftmost column now marks the threads that carry one.
No new worker query is involved: notmuch applies the "attachment" tag
while indexing, so ThreadSummary already holds what this needs. The
marker is a glyph rather than an icon resource, which ships no new asset
and inherits the row font, so it strikes through with a doomed thread
like every other cell. It falls back to "*" where the system font cannot
draw U+1F4CE, since an unrenderable codepoint reads as breakage rather
than as a marker.
Two silent Qt behaviours had to be handled, both found by probe:
QHeaderView::restoreState() returns true for a blob saved against fewer
columns and applies the old widths shifted one place right. Adding a
column in front would therefore have mangled every existing saved
layout with no error to detect it by. The column count is now stored
beside the blob and a mismatch discards it, so the widths reset once on
upgrade instead of landing on the wrong columns.
QHeaderView's default minimumSectionSize is 58px on this platform, and
setColumnWidth() clamps to it without reporting the smaller value back,
so the column could not be narrow at all until it was lowered.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
Spelled out per row, tags ran to 500 pixels of largely repeated text and
took most of the thread list's width. The column is gone; tags render as
coloured chips split by what they actually mean.
An account tag says which mailbox a thread arrived in, and draws as a
chip in front of the subject. A functional tag says what state a thread
is in, and those fill one row under the message pane. One row keeps the
message area from shifting between threads with different tag counts, so
whatever does not fit collapses into a +N chip that names the rest in its
tooltip.
TagColors resolves a colour by exact tag first, then by top-level prefix,
so a single "shopping" entry covers shopping/amazon and shopping/nike
while shopping/amazon can still override its own. That matters at 96
tags. Built-in defaults cover the usual state tags, and anything left
unconfigured falls back to a hash of the name, stable so a chip does not
change colour as the list scrolls.
|
|
Selecting a thread and hitting Delete changed nothing on screen, so
there was no way to tell the action had stuck.
The tag was always applied: applyTagChange() emitted dataChanged across
the row, and the Tags column did update. But Subject was set to stretch
while Tags came after it, so Subject took all free width and pushed Tags
out of view. The feedback lived in the one column that could not be seen.
Columns are now Tags, Date, From, Subject, with Subject stretching last
so nothing can be pushed off the right edge. A thread tagged deleted or
spam fills its whole row, muted red or orange with white struck-through
text, through the background, foreground and font roles, so no cue
depends on one column remaining visible.
Strike-through accompanies the fill on purpose: it survives a theme that
overrides backgrounds and reads without colour. Bold for unread still
composes with it.
Archive adds no tag, so an archived row is left unstyled for now.
|
|
Confirmed with the maintainer as v2-only rather than v2-or-later. LICENSE is
the official text from gnu.org. Every file under src/ and tests/ carries the
matching notice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
QAbstractTableModel over query results, appended in batches so a large
query paints its first screenful immediately. Tag changes apply locally
for optimistic UI; reverting a failed write means calling applyTagChange
again with added and removed swapped, which the round-trip test pins.
Two additions to the drafted version:
- A ThreadIdRole, so a view's QModelIndex maps back to the thread id the
worker speaks without every caller reaching around the model.
- data() checks its own row and column bounds. Qt will not hand out an
out-of-range index and invalidates persistent ones on reset, so this is
unreachable defence rather than a live path; the test says so instead of
pretending to cover it.
Verified by mutation that the empty-batch guard, the ThreadIdRole, and the
full-row dataChanged range each fail exactly one test when removed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
