aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/superpowers
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
12 daysdocs: split the closed backlog items out to a companion fileDanilo M.3-4511/+4561
Item 73. The backlog kept every item's full Observed/Cause/Approach section forever, including the sixty-eight that are closed, and had reached 5056 lines: past the point where it could be read in one pass, and past the point where a tool could open it at all. The closed sections move to 2026-08-03-post-0.1.0-usability-closed.md, taking the backlog to 570 lines. The status table stays where it was and remains the index of all 80 items, so a closed item keeps its row, its date and its outcome beside the open ones; only its evidence moved. Nothing was renumbered and nothing was deleted, which the item required: the numbering is cited from commit messages, from CLAUDE.md and from the specs, and both files share one sequence, so item 42 is `## 42.` in whichever file holds it. The split was done by script and verified by set difference rather than by reading: every non-blank line of the original appears in one of the two files, zero missing, and the only lines not in the original are the new file's header. All 80 numbers resolve, every open item has its section in the backlog, every closed one in the archive, with no duplicates and no orphans. Two things the item's own approach did not anticipate. Three cross-references said "see below" and their targets had just moved, so rows 60 and 75 and the header's note on item 20's parked branch now say where the entry went. And the cause was never the fifty done sections, it was that nothing moved a section on the day its item closed; doing this once buys a few months and then item 73 returns. The rule in "Adding to this document" now requires the move on the closing commit, and CLAUDE.md tells a future session that grepping the backlog for a closed item's evidence will find the table row and nothing else. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 daysfeat(rules): preview a rule's mail in the thread listDanilo M.1-1/+13
Item 77. The dialog could say how many messages a rule matched and not which ones. A Preview in list button now runs the selected rule's query in the main window; the dialog stays open, since comparing the rule against its results is the point. Two constraints from the backlog entry, both now asserted and both mutation-checked. The query runs exactly as stored, with no tag:new and no wrapping parentheses. The post-new hook adds those when it applies a rule, and a preview that copied them would match nothing outside a sync window, since tag:new is set only on mail that has just arrived. The account selector is cleared first. runQuery() wraps the bar's text in the selected account's scope, and a rule query usually names its own path already, so previewing one with an account selected would scope it twice and show an empty list, which reads as "this rule collects no mail". The second mutation only fails once the test's config has an account to select: with the default empty config the selector sits on "All accounts" anyway, and asserting that a preview leaves it there passed against the mutation. Recorded in the test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 daysfix(rules): a long rule no longer squeezes the rule list awayDanilo M.1-0/+34
Item 80. A rule with eight From conditions left the list showing about one and a half rows. The list was added with stretch 1 and the form below it with none, which looks decisive and is not: a stretch factor only distributes space above each widget's minimum, and the form's minimum grew with every condition row, so each row came straight out of the list. The builder asked for 120px with one row and 414px with eight. A QSplitter now divides the list from the editor, so the balance is the user's and is saved beside the column widths, and the condition rows sit in a QScrollArea capped at 190px so the editor cannot grow without bound however the splitter is set. The scroll area is what text mode hides; hiding the builder inside it would leave an empty frame. Three measures were tried in the test before one told the bug and the fix apart, and two passed against broken code: the dialog's minimumSizeHint does not track form rows and read 580 either way, and a qMin against the scroll area's own hint read small whether or not the cap was set, since an uncapped maximumHeight is QWIDGETSIZE_MAX. What survives mutation is the editor pane's minimum inside the splitter, plus the cap read directly, and both are asserted. A row's size hint is invalid until the event loop runs, so the test calls processEvents after selecting a rule or it measures the same height twice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 daysdocs: the window size cannot be restored under a tiling compositorDanilo M.1-4/+23
Item 75 shipped claiming the rules window remembers its size. It does not, and no code here can make it. Hyprland tiles the window to fill its slot, so the size dragged belongs to the tile. saveGeometry stores frameGeometry beside normalGeometry and restoreGeometry restores the normal one, which stays at whatever resize() last set it to. Decoded from the real state file after a hand test: frame 2248x806, normal 760x664. The dialog restores 760 correctly and still opens tiled. Three diagnoses were tried before this one and each was disproved by a probe rather than argued away: that restoreGeometry rejected the blob as off-screen, that the layout overrode a geometry applied before the first show, and that a test could tell the broken and fixed versions apart. The last one matters most: the offscreen platform returns an identical frame for both, so a size assertion passed against the bug and a mutation restoring it left the suite green. That assertion is not reinstated. The column widths, which are what actually works, keep their test. The changelog and the backlog entry are corrected to say what ships, and CLAUDE.md gains both the tiling-compositor trap and the rule that the offscreen platform cannot test window sizing at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 daysfix(rules): save the window size on Cancel and Save, not only on XDanilo M.1-0/+12
The geometry was saved from closeEvent, and neither dialog button sends one: Cancel calls reject(), Save calls accept(), and only the window manager's X button produces a QCloseEvent. So the size and the column widths were kept for the one route out of three that a user almost never takes, and a resize followed by Cancel came back forgotten. The save moves to a done(int) override, which both buttons funnel through and which QWidget::close() also reaches. The test that covered this passed against the bug because it asserted with close(). It now drives all three routes rather than trusting one to stand for the others, and shows the dialog before the close leg: close() on a widget that was never visible returns early without reaching done(), so that assertion would otherwise prove nothing. Both traps recorded in CLAUDE.md, since neither is specific to this dialog. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 daysfeat(rules): the rules window keeps its size and column widthsDanilo M.1-2/+20
Item 75. saveGeometry() and the rule list header's saveState() go to uistate.conf under keys of their own, written on closeEvent so a size survives Cancel as well as Save. The 760x520 resize stays as the first-run fallback. The backlog's approach was wrong on one point and a test caught it. It said to drop the resizeColumnToContents calls once a saved header state exists, which fixes the restore and leaves the original defect standing: with nothing saved, a width the user had just dragged was still discarded by the next add or delete. Each column is instead auto-sized once, on its first fill, after which the width belongs to the user however it was set. Two flags, because the count column is filled later by a reply from the worker. The window stays a QDialog. Making it a top-level window needs the unsaved-edit story that being modal currently sidesteps, and that is its own decision rather than part of this item. Both tests redirect XDG_STATE_HOME as well as XDG_CONFIG_HOME, so they cannot write the real uistate.conf. The geometry is asserted on the stored value rather than the reopened frame, per item 46: the offscreen platform does not honour a resize. Also corrects setFolders' doc comment, which still described the folder list as coming from Config. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 daysfix(rules): keep the text-mode toggle reachableDanilo M.1-2/+15
Ticking "Edit as text" was a one-way trip: the only way back to the rows was closing the dialog and reopening it. The checkbox was parented to the builder widget and sat on the match row, and switching to text mode hides that widget, so the toggle disappeared along with the rows it governs. Move it to the query row, which is visible in both modes. The existing tests all passed against this, because they drove the toggle through setChecked and then asserted on the checked STATE. A hidden checkbox reports its state perfectly well, so every one of those assertions held while the widget was unreachable. The new test asks the question that matters, whether the toggle would be on screen, and it uses isVisibleTo since nothing is isVisible on a dialog that was never shown. Worth recording how close the mutation check came to endorsing this too. Reparenting the checkbox alone left it in the query row's layout, so it stayed visible and the test still passed. Only restoring the full shipped shape, parent and layout together, reproduced the fault and failed the test. A mutation that does not reproduce the original bug proves nothing about the test that is meant to catch it. The spec's layout sketch carried the same error and is corrected, with the reason, so the next reader does not reintroduce it.
12 daysdocs: the data-loss defect took the note tooDanilo M.1-2/+10
The first pass of the field repair restored the query and the tags and stopped there. The note was also blank, which the user noticed: every sibling account rule carries an identical note and only the damaged rule had none. The reason it was missed is worth keeping. The shell backup was read for the tagging command, and the note comes from the comment block above it, which the migration had given to all five account rules alike. The handler at fault writes every field of a rule, so every field is equally exposed, and a repair that checks only the fields that first drew attention will leave some of the damage in place. Restored from the four siblings, which are byte-identical, and the whole file re-audited: no rule now has an empty query, id, note or tag list.
12 daysdocs: record the rules dialog data-loss defect as item 79Danilo M.1-0/+52
Opening the tagging rules dialog and pressing Save destroyed the first rule in the list, without any editing. The rule lost its query and its tags, then vanished entirely on the next load, since a rule with an empty query is dropped as malformed. Reproduced against the released tag rather than the branch, in a throwaway worktree at 9585674 with a two-rule fixture: constructing the dialog and running its save path left one rule of two. onSelectionChanged blocked signals for the note widget only, while m_enabled::toggled two lines later reached applyEditsToCurrentRule, which writes every field from widgets the loader has not filled yet. The existing comment there shows the hazard was known for one widget and not extended to the other. The fix landed with the builder work: the reloading flag now covers the whole load, and switchingRulesDoesNotLeakRowsBetweenThem is the regression test, verified by mutation to fail without the guard. The live rules file had one casualty, the account rule sitting first in the list, with both its query and its tags empty while every sibling was intact. Restored from the shell backup that the earlier migration kept and verified through mailctl's own reader. The rule had stopped tagging, but only one message had arrived meanwhile; that message is now tagged and the account is complete again at 14969 of 14969.
12 daysdocs: correct the claim that a paren-bearing value is unrepresentableDanilo M.2-9/+33
The spec listed from:(((( among the queries the parser must reject, and the plan's Task 6 asserted that rejection. Probing the built parser shows it accepts the query as a From row whose value is the literal text, and compiles it back byte for byte. That is correct behaviour, not a leak in the strictness rule. notmuch reads those parens as characters to search for rather than as grouping, so the query is meaningful and the row displaying it tells the truth. Rejecting it would buy nothing and would push a representable rule into text mode. The distinction the documents were missing: a parenthesis inside a VALUE is not a shape question at all, only a parenthesis in grouping position is. Restate both documents accordingly, and replace the assertion with a round-trip one, which is the property that actually matters here.
12 daysdocs,rulequery: state the tag quoting rule rather than the testDanilo M.1-2/+16
The draft compile() quoted every Is/IsNot term, which contradicted the same task's own assertion that a negated tag compiles to . The implementer resolved it in the direction the tests specify, and the resolution is right: notmuch reads tag:inbox and tag:"inbox" identically, counting 5322 either way against the live index, so quoting a tag would change the stored string without changing what it matches. That breaks the byte-for-byte round trip this type exists to guarantee. Restate the comment as the rule rather than as a note about what a test expects, correct the plan's draft so the remaining tasks do not inherit the contradiction, and warn the parser task that a quoted tag must not be read back as a quoting operator.
12 daysdocs: implementation plan for the rule builderDanilo M.1-0/+2054
Twelve tasks against the design approved today, TDD throughout: RuleQuery comes first as a value type with no widget dependency, tested on exact strings, and the dialog is wired to it only once parsing and compiling round-trip. Two tasks carry the guarantees the design was shaped around rather than merely testing behaviour. Task 7 round-trips every query shape present in the live rules file and pins it with a mutation check, since a compile that differs by one paren would rewrite a file a second tool reads. Task 6 pins whole-query rejection, because a parser that salvages the part it understands is how a not clause goes missing and a live mail filter silently widens. Queries in the tests are generic placeholders. The shapes are what is under test and they survive substitution intact.
12 daysdocs: record items 75-78 and design the rule builderDanilo M.2-0/+512
The standing backlog reconciliation found four unrecorded entries in the user's notes, all fallout from item 44's rules dialog now that it is in daily use: the window forgets its geometry and column widths (75), every field is free text (76), a rule cannot be previewed against the thread list (77), and there is no way to build a rule from something visible in a message (78). Each cause is verified in the code rather than copied from the note. Item 76 then went through a brainstorming pass and has a design. The shape is Thunderbird's filter window, which the user supplied as the reference: field and operator dropdowns, +/- buttons per row, an all/any radio, and a separate "but not" block. The structural point is that Thunderbird owns its filter format and this project does not. The storage is a notmuch query string shared with mailctl and executed by the post-new hook, so the builder is a view over a string rather than a store. That decides the rest: the stored format is untouched and this stays a single-repo change; a query the builder cannot represent still opens, saves and runs, in a text mode every rule carries; and the string is rewritten only when the rows actually changed, compared against the parsed value rather than tracked with a dirty flag, which Qt sets during programmatic population. Measured against the seventeen rules in the live store, sixteen are flat and one nests an or group inside an and chain, which is what the exclusion block exists for. The parser is strict by design: it recognises a query whole or rejects it whole, because a lenient parser that salvages what it understands is how a not clause gets dropped and a filter silently widens.
12 daystest(mainwindow): stop the suite reading the real kernel lock tableDanilo M.1-1/+27
Item 61. An init() fixture gives every test its own empty lock table in a QTemporaryDir, so no test observes the machine's real sync state. The failure was never intermittent in the usual sense: 0 failures in 30 runs with no lock held, 30 in 30 with one held. It presented as three tests failing that never mention syncing, and cost three misdiagnoses. The three tests that already used the seam each restored "/proc/locks" when finished, which was itself the defect: it handed the real table to whichever test ran next, so one test opting in re-exposed all the others. Those restores are gone and cleanup() leaves the temporary path in place. noTestCanSeeTheRealLockTable guards the fixture, since a silent revert would go back to failing for reasons no assertion mentions. Verified with the lock deliberately held: 3 failures before, 119/119 after, full suite 19/19. Mutation-checked by disabling the fixture, where the guard fails first and a real test fails behind it.
12 daysdocs(backlog): record item 44 as doneDanilo M.1-1/+45
The tagging rules moved from the shell post-new hook to a shared JSON store both qtmaildir and mailctl read. Seventeen real rules were converted, each keeping its shell comment as a note, and the conversion was proved against the real index before anything was installed. Four findings are recorded in CLAUDE.md rather than only here, because they will outlive the item: a stored query carries no scope and the hook parenthesises it (a disjunction would otherwise escape tag:new and match everything); notmuch's parser rejects almost nothing, so a test asserting a provoked query failure fails against correct code; rule counts must count messages rather than threads; and a count request must not bump the query generation, which would blank the message pane.
13 daysdocs(plans): implementation plan for the shared tagging rulesDanilo M.1-0/+2955
Fifteen tasks across two repositories, TDD throughout. Tasks 1-9 build the format, the post-new hook and mailctl's read-only rules command; 10-13 add qtmaildir's reader and dialog; 14 migrates the real rules and 15 closes the backlog item. One deviation from the spec, recorded at the top of the plan: the spec called for a countRules worker slot, but requestCounts already exists and counts threads. A tagging rule tags messages, so the plan adds a general requestMessageCounts instead of a rule-specific slot.
13 daysdocs(backlog): specify item 44 as a shared tagging-rule storeDanilo M.2-23/+432
Item 44 sat as "open, unspecified" because nothing in this application applies rules at sync time, and the item could not be planned until it was known whether such rules existed anywhere. They do: the notmuch post-new hook holds hand-written `notmuch tag` lines scoped to tag:new, carrying their reasoning in shell comments. The design moves them to a tool-neutral JSON store that both qtmaildir and mailctl read, with unknown fields preserved across a write by either tool so neither owns the format. A rule carries no scope, so the same rule serves the hook, a dry run and a future backfill. Also in this pass: - Item 61's cause is established, not open. It is the user's cron sync holding the mbsync lock: 0 failures in 30 runs with no lock held, 30 in 30 with one held. The fix is item 38's existing seam applied across the suite. The document still said "not established" and proposed a load hypothesis that had already failed to reproduce. - Item 74 records the first-start latency measured this session. The delay is the notmuch index paging in from disk, 5714 ms cold against 154 ms warm for the same 4444-thread query, and is not addressable here. What it did expose is a real defect: the status bar holds "Searching..." for the whole walk while rows are already arriving.
14 daysfeat(panes): draw the pane marks from shipped SVGs, not font glyphsDanilo M.1-2/+53
Items 70 and 69, the second folded into the first as item 70's own size note predicted it should be. The panes drew their state marks as font glyphs: U+1F4CE for an attachment and U+2605 for a flagged thread, each with a fallback for a font that cannot render it. Both fell back to "*", so on such a font a flagged thread and one carrying an attachment were indistinguishable, which is a defect the fallback introduced rather than prevented. What a mark looks like was also the desktop's decision rather than this application's, and the panes are exactly where it should not be: the user asked for the toolbar and menus to keep following their icon theme while the panes stop. Six marks now ship in assets/icons/marks/: flagged, attachment, passed, replied and the two expander triangles. QIcon::fromTheme still resolves every toolbar and menu icon and was not touched. Licensing chose the shapes. The look came from a GPL3 icon theme, and this project is GPLv2-only, which are incompatible: GPLv2's "no further restrictions" clause bars shipping GPL3 assets in a v2-only work. The six were drawn fresh in the same idiom instead, with no path data copied. The idiom is generic: solid single-path silhouettes at 16x16 with no strokes. They are compiled in as string literals rather than loaded from a .qrc. src/CMakeLists.txt already records why resources belong to the executable: a qrc in the static library registers itself from a global initialiser the linker drops. The tests link the library, so a resource-based mark would be missing exactly where it needs asserting. assets/icons/marks/ stays the editable source. One asset serves both palettes. Every payload paints with fill="currentColor", which QSvgRenderer renders black rather than resolving, so Marks::pixmap composites the wanted colour with CompositionMode_SourceIn. A mark then takes the card's own pen colour and follows selection and the read/unread dimming without a second variant to keep in step. CardLayout reserves a rect per mark and CardDelegate paints into it. The marks were glyphs inside the subject STRING, so their width came free from the text metrics; as icons the geometry has to know they are there or the subject runs underneath them. The expander pill had the same trap, its triangle being a glyph in expanderLabel(), and now reserves that width explicitly. Item 69's part: passed and replied were words in the tag strip and are marks beside the subject now. The message pane's header carries the flagged and attachment marks next to the subject, per the user's decision that the right pane needs those two and only outside the message area. A duplicate that no test caught is worth recording. Every geometry assertion passed while a card showed passed as BOTH an arrow and a green tag chip: the chip filter had no reason to know a mark had appeared. It was found by rendering real cards to an image and looking at them. isDrawnAsAMark() is now one list consulted by both PillTagsRole and MessageOwnTagsRole, since two copies drifting apart is how a tag ends up drawn twice on one row and not at all on another. Fourteen tests: nine in test_marks, four in test_cardlayout, one in test_threadlistmodel. Mutation-checked at four points, each failing a test: the subject ignoring the marks, the flag not indenting the subject, the pill forgetting the triangle's width, and the recolour composite removed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
14 daysfeat(sync): sync a tag change automatically after a short delayDanilo M.1-1/+47
Item 71. A tag edit reached the notmuch index at edit time and then sat there until the user clicked Sync or their cron job fired, so "mark all read" updated the view while the change itself waited, sometimes for ten minutes. A confirmed edit now arms a debounce that runs the existing sync path. The delay is auto_sync_delay_ms in [general], defaulting to 2000, and follows mark_read_delay_ms exactly, including that zero and negative are not errors: zero syncs on the next trip through the event loop, and any negative value disables the behaviour, which is the switch for a user who wants only their cron job. It is armed from onTagsApplied, where a write is confirmed and the pending count is already current, rather than where one is sent: a sync scheduled for a write the worker went on to reject would run for nothing. A debounce rather than a schedule, restarted by each edit, because "mark all read" confirms one write per thread in the view and an arm-per-edit timer would be the storm of syncs the debounce exists to prevent. Nothing is armed when no sync command is configured or when the pending count is zero, the case where an edit was netted against its own inverse. When the timer fires with a sync already running, local or cron, it skips rather than queues: mbsync's own answer to a second run is to fail on it, and the edits stay pending rather than being lost. Also fixes a pane blanked out from under the reader, found by hand testing this feature. onSyncFinished called runCurrentQuery() where the cron path calls refreshCurrentQuery(), and a re-run clears the model, the undo stack and the message pane. The stale-thread notice handles a thread that stops matching the query and has since item 35, but a re-run left nothing for it to describe. The two paths had no reason to differ; before this item a local sync only followed a click on Sync, so the difference went unnoticed. Reading a message in the Unread view, having it marked read, and watching the pane go blank two seconds later is what surfaced it. Its test asserts on the undo stack rather than the pane: both paths issue a queued query test_mainwindow has no worker to answer, so the pane ends up blank either way and an assertion on it would pass against both, while the undo stack is cleared by one and kept by the other. Nine tests, four in test_config and five in test_mainwindow, each mutation-checked: removing the schedule call, honouring a negative delay, dropping the nothing-pending guard, dropping the already-running guard, and restoring runCurrentQuery() each fail a test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
14 daysdocs(backlog): record item 67 as shipped in 0.15.0Danilo M.1-1/+13
The session's backlog reconciliation against the user's notes found nothing unrecorded, but did find item 67's status cell still reading "open" after the work shipped in 0.15.0 (72812c0). The section's Approach also proposed tag:draft as the obvious drafts query, which the implementation rejected: it counts 0 against the real database and no draft-ish tag exists there at all, so a tag-based line would have been a permanent zero that reads as working code. Both lines are folder-composed instead. Recording that, since the Approach as written would otherwise send the next reader down the path it was already measured out of. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
14 daysdocs(backlog): reconcile with the user's notes, and settle item 68Danilo M.1-0/+244
Eight entries from the notes had no item here. Appended as 66 to 73 with each cause verified in the code rather than copied from the note: a blank message pane on a first click (66), missing sent and drafts counts (67), a forwarded-subject tag (68), passed and replied as words rather than glyphs (69), pane icons against system icons (70), no sync after a toolbar action (71), khard/khal (72), and this document's own size (73). Item 68 arrived as "the passed tag appears for Fwd: but not Fw:, expand it". Measured against the real database, that correlation does not exist: 6 messages carry the tag in total, 194 Fwd: subjects carry none, and every tagged message has P in its Maildir flags. The tag is the Maildir P flag translated by notmuch under maildir.synchronize_flags, written by whichever client forwarded the message. Nothing anywhere reads a subject line, so there is no rule to expand. The section now carries the measurements and costs the two real options, a display-only mark against writing the flag out to 222 messages, and stays open pending that decision.
2026-08-11feat(sent): add a Sent view, flat and by recipientDanilo M.2-2/+62
Adds a `sent` key to [account.*] naming that account's sent folder, and a Sent button beside the saved queries that composes its query from every account carrying one. An account without the key is omitted silently, as a real account may keep no sent mail locally. With no account selected the button spans all of them; selecting one narrows it through the existing scope wrap rather than a second path. Composed at run time rather than shipped as a [queries] entry. A saved query is one fixed string: it cannot narrow to the selected account, and it goes stale the moment an account is added or a provider renames a folder. The design and the measurements behind it are in docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-11-sent-mail-design.md. Three things there are worth repeating here. The composed path is QUOTED, and that is load-bearing. A real provider nests its sent folder under a bracketed parent, and "[" and "]" are Xapian syntax: unquoted, the query parses rather than matches and returns nothing while looking entirely plausible. Composition happens in one place so there is one chance to get it right, and a bracketed path is pinned in a test. Recipients are opt-in per query, which is a performance contract rather than a preference. notmuch_message_get_header(m, "To") is not served from the index, it reads the message file: folding every thread of a 4411-thread inbox took 38.2 seconds against 251 ms for the 601-thread sent view. The worker skips the walk entirely unless asked, and the refresh path carries the same flag so a background sync cannot blank the column mid-read. Always folding is mutation-tested: the data would be right and only the cost wrong, which nothing else here would notice. The messages reached through the thread are owned by it and freed with it, so recipientsOf() holds them raw and finishes while the thread is alive, exactly as walkReplies does. An NmMessage wrapper there is a double-free. Sent mail is presented flat, and the pane follows. A message you sent otherwise drags in the replies you received, so a view labelled Sent shows conversations rather than what you sent. ThreadListModel::setFlatMode() makes hasChildren() and ReplyCountRole answer differently and changes nothing else; runQuery() sets it on EVERY run, so any other query restores the tree on its way through and the flag cannot outlive the button that set it. The pane needed its own fix for the same reason: the single-message path depends on a field only filled when a thread is expanded, which never happens in a flat list, so loadThread() gained matchedOnly and drops the messages that did not match instead of rendering them as stubs. Recipients replace the sender through the existing SendersRole rather than a new one, so the delegate needs no branch and cannot disagree with the model about which name a row shows. It falls back to the sender when a To header is absent or unparseable, since a blank where a name belongs reads as a rendering fault. Address parsing uses GMime: a display name may contain a comma, so "Rossi, Mario" <m@example.org>, info@example.net is two addresses and splitting reports three. internet_address_list_parse returns NULL for an empty string, which is a crash if unguarded. Backlog item 63.
2026-08-11docs: specify item 63, sent mail, in its own design fileDanilo M.2-15/+225
The backlog entry could not be planned because it turned on a fact about the user's mail rather than a design choice. Measured against the real database: no `sent` tag exists at all, so the XS branch is dead. Every account keeps sent mail in a folder, and the folders disagree across three shapes, with one account having no sent folder whatsoever. That rules out a `<maildir>/Sent` convention and forces a per-account key. Decisions recorded: a per-account `sent` key composed at run time rather than a shipped [queries] entry, which cannot narrow to the selected account and goes stale when an account is added; an account without the key omitted silently, as `drafts` already is; all-accounts combines and one account scopes through the existing wrap; and recipients on the card in a Sent view, since the sender is the user on every row. Three constraints came from probing rather than memory. A bracketed provider path contains `[` and `]`, which are Xapian syntax, so quoting is load-bearing and the composed query returns its real count only because each path is quoted. notmuch has get_authors and no recipients call at any level, so the To summary must be folded per message in the worker, under the same thread-ownership rule as walkReplies. And GMime's internet_address_list_parse returns NULL for an empty string, which is a crash if unguarded; it also parses a comma inside a quoted display name correctly, so comma-splitting is out. Size revised M, up from S: the recipients half is a new ThreadSummary field, a worker-side per-message walk, the first GMime address parsing in this codebase, and a card that has to know which view it is in. The spec lives in its own file rather than inline. The backlog is past four thousand lines and its job is to say what is open and how big, which a hundred lines of design buries. The entry keeps the finding and the size and points at the spec, following item 53. "Adding to this document" now states the split rule so the next specified item does not land inline again. Account keys and folder names in the spec are placeholders. The counts and the folder shapes are the real measurement and are what the design turns on. Backlog item 63.
2026-08-11feat(config): let the date format on a card be configuredDanilo M.1-1/+25
Adds [general] date_format, a QDateTime pattern for the date a thread card shows. Absent or empty means the system locale's short format, which is what every other application on the desktop uses and stays the default. The format reaches the LAYOUT, not only the painter. CardLayout::compute() reserves the date's width from widestDateSample(), so a pattern that arrived only at the drawText call would be elided into a rect sized for the old format, which is the clipping the bold-font fault already produced once. It rides on CardLayout::Input and defaults to an empty string, leaving every existing call site unchanged. Confirmed by mutation: making the width ignore the format fails the test. widestDateSample() memoised its result in a static, which would have sized every format after the first from whichever arrived first. It is a plain call now, costing one QLocale lookup per row, the same as formatting the date. Validation rejects only a pattern whose output is CONSTANT, found by formatting two different instants and comparing. QDateTime::toString() treats nearly every letter as a field, so "banana" formats as "bpmnpmnpm" and "hello" as "22ello": nonsense, but they vary with the instant, and a check claiming to find "no date field" cannot reject them. What harms the user is the pattern that prints the same text on every card, and that is what is refused, with the value named in the message. The model supplies the pattern through DateFormatRole for the same reason it supplies the tag colours: it is the one object here holding config, and a delegate reading config itself would be a second source of truth. Backlog item 62.
2026-08-11feat(ui): give Sync the refresh iconDanilo M.1-0/+64
The Sync button used mail-receive, a mailbox glyph, which reads as "mail" rather than "fetch again". The toolbar follows the desktop's tool button style, so on an icon-only desktop the icon is the whole control and has to carry the meaning by itself. view-refresh is the standard freedesktop name for the action. The existing noTwoActionsShareAnIcon test covers the collision risk that the 0.12.0 Archive/Mark-all-read defect came from, and passes. Also records the backlog reconciliation this came from: items 64 and 65, appended from the user's notes with their causes verified in code. 65 is "full code review and optimization", which names no symptom or measurement and is filed unspecified rather than given a design. Backlog item 64.
2026-08-10feat(view): follow a background sync without a keystrokeDanilo M.1-2/+381
The thread list now updates itself when a sync finishes, whether it is empty or populated. New threads appear where the sort puts them, threads that stopped matching leave, and threads whose state changed repaint. Refreshing used to mean re-running the query, which cleared the model, the selection, the message pane and the undo stack, so 0.8.0 declined to do it on a cron timer and asked the user to press Enter instead. The result was a list that quietly disagreed with the database: mail indexed by cron never appeared, and an Unread view read to the end sat empty in front of it. ThreadListModel::reconcile() diffs a result against the current rows by thread id instead, so a surviving thread keeps its row, its persistent index and its loaded replies. Order comes from the result and is never imposed here, which is what makes the sort dropdown authoritative. The undo constraint this was sized around did not exist: no undo entry was ever keyed on a row. ThreadTagCommand stores thread ids and MessageTagCommand stores message ids, and applyTagChange() looks its target up by id, so an entry already survived its rows leaving the view. A thread read out of the current view now leaves the list, which is correct and would otherwise strand the reader, so MessageView grows a notice saying the open thread no longer matches, with a button that re-queries it. Recovery lists the whole conversation, expands it, and restores the message that was on screen rather than reopening at the first one. Ten defects were found building this, nine of them by hand testing: - SyncMonitor::start() polls synchronously, so an idle lock file emits stateChanged(Idle) from inside buildUi() and the first handler to touch a widget segfaults before the window exists. - QTreeView sets a current index when it takes focus with none set, and current drives loading, so new mail opened itself and was marked read without the user having looked at it. Selection is now required. - The notice outlived what it described, both when the pane was blanked and when another message replaced it. - Retiring the "Background sync completed" message left the bar claiming a sync was still running: silent means saying nothing new, not leaving a stale claim on screen. - A thread root sets both the thread id and the message id, so treating the message id as the message-row case discarded it for the commonest way to open a thread. - A freshly queried root does not know its own first message until the tree loads, so recovery selected nothing and left the pane blank. - A user query mid-recovery had its result hijacked by the pending selection. - MessageView emitted the recovery signal with its own members, so a direct connection handed MainWindow references that runCurrentQuery() then cleared by blanking the pane. The ids went empty mid-slot and no recovery ever ran. Every test passed against this, because reaching a slot through invokeMethod copies its arguments. A Qt signal argument is a reference until something copies it. Emitting a member to a slot that can re-enter the emitter is a use-after-write, and it presents as a wrong value rather than as a crash. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10docs: record the intermittent test_mainwindow failure as item 61Danilo M.1-0/+43
Two tests fail about one full run in twenty, and neither is caused by the card list: a worktree at f72dba9, before any of that work, failed 3 of 12 runs, and neither test was touched by it. Recorded with what was measured and what was not. The cause is NOT established: synthetic CPU load did not reproduce it, so the trigger is narrower than "the machine is busy", and the entry says so rather than shipping a plausible guess for the next reader to trust.
2026-08-10docs: close items 20, 51, 53 and 60, now that the card list is on masterDanilo M.1-20/+22
Three passages claimed the code was not on master, which stopped being true at the merge. The distinction worth keeping is which branch a reference points at: item 20's file and line references still mean `item-20-message-rows` at 029a50e, kept unmerged as the record of the presentation the user rejected, while master carries the card list built on top of it.
2026-08-10docs: record the card list, and correct what CLAUDE.md claimsDanilo M.1-9/+21
The architecture section described ThreadListView as existing to paint a strip across columns. That was true until this change and is now the opposite of true: it survives only for the expander hit-test. Kept as one paragraph of history, since it explains the file's shape, but no longer stated as current behaviour. Two traps are recorded inverted rather than deleted, because the rule survived its own reason changing. The reply indent is still asserted on where the TEXT lands, but where visualRect lies has flipped: it used to report an indent the text did not have, and now reports none while the text is indented. And Q_ENUM is documented as insufficient for a queued Q_ARG, which cost a silently dropped sort argument. Item 60's recorded cause was wrong and is corrected in place. It was read off master, where the row arithmetic really is current.row() + 1; the branch had already fixed it a commit earlier with threadRowOf(). The entry stays, with the correction, because the reasoning was sound and the tests it demanded now exist. Items 20, 51 and 53 are marked built on the branch rather than done. Nothing is merged and the user has not seen it, which is the whole point of Task 10.
2026-08-10docs(item-20): specify message rows in the thread list and plan the workDanilo M.1-9/+0
The item sat as 'open, unspecified' since 2026-08-04, recording only that the user's mental model differed from what was built. Described now from three screenshots plus four decisions: the left pane gains message rows, the root row IS the thread's first message, replies indent by true reply depth, and action scope follows the selected row kind. No confirmation dialog, per this project's standing rule. The hazard the design introduces is ambiguity rather than destruction, since deleted is a tag and every mutation is invertible, so the scope is named in the status bar before and after the action instead. Sized L, the largest item in the backlog and the first to warrant a branch. The plan records four API facts verified against the installed headers, each contradicting the obvious approach: replies are unreachable from a query walk, thread-derived messages must not be RAII-wrapped, QTreeView lacks isRowSelected(int), and a tree numbers rows per parent.
2026-08-09docs: keep the card list off master, and name the way backDanilo M.1-6/+60
The user asked to be able to abandon this cleanly. Task 0 now branches `card-list` off a rebased copy rather than rebasing `item-20-message-rows` in place, which would have destroyed the record of what the rejected presentation looked like. Nothing in the plan touches master, stated as a requirement rather than left to convention, with the escape hatch written out: `git checkout master` is the whole of the undo. Task 0 gains a step that verifies master and the original branch are both where they started, since a rebase onto the wrong branch is silent and every later task assumes master is the thing to fall back to. Task 10 now ends by explicitly forbidding a merge. This design was reached by rejecting a previous one that was finished, tested and green, so a passing suite is not what decides it: the user looks at the cards. That is the one instruction most likely to be lost between sessions, and it is the one that matters.
2026-08-09docs: make the account colour the card's accent, not a chipDanilo M.2-18/+276
The plan left the account chip unspecified, because where it sits on a card was never decided and inventing a place would have been a guess. The user's answer replaces it rather than placing it: a coloured bar down the card's left edge, the reply spines inheriting that colour, and matching swatches in the account dropdown. It is a net simplification. The chip ate a third of line 2 on every card to repeat a name the user already knows, which is the table-of-records texture item 53 is about; the bar says the same thing in a few pixels and leaves line 2 to the subject. Three details that are easy to get wrong and are specified rather than left to the implementer: - The raw account colour is never drawn as a line. It is chosen to be a chip's FILL, with text drawn on top in whatever stays legible against it. A thin line on the pane's own background has a different job: followable down a long expansion without competing with the senders beside it. The accent blends toward QPalette::Base by the same 0.35 weight threadLineColour() already uses, keeping the hue and dropping the shout. The dropdown swatch does use the raw colour, being a filled patch rather than a line. - A reply resolves its THREAD's colour by walking to the root. AccountColourRole is empty on a message row, so a spine reading its own index would fall back to the neutral line under an accented root and break the continuous edge the design is built on. - Reply cards carry no bar of their own. Two vertical lines a few pixels apart in one gutter is what option B looked like, and the spine already carries the accent. colourFor() never failing is kept deliberately: an account with no colour= key gets a stable colour derived from its tag name, so adding an account and forgetting to colour it degrades to something usable rather than to nothing. kAccentWidth ships at 3px as a starting value. Whether five accounts are tellable apart at that width, on this user's screen and theme, is not decidable from a mockup or a test, so Task 10 gains a step that settles it against real cards, in both themes, with the guidance to widen the bar before touching the user's own colour choices.
2026-08-09docs: plan the card list implementationDanilo M.1-0/+1958
Eleven tasks against the card-list spec, TDD throughout, each with its own mutation check. Three decisions the plan makes that the spec did not: - Task 0 rebases the branch first. item-20-message-rows is 15 commits behind master and conflicts in eight files, one of which carries the item 55 splitter fix in the same file this plan rewrites heavily. Resolving that while also building a feature would mean debugging a merge and a feature at once, so it is its own task with its own verification step. - CardLayout is a separate file from CardDelegate, holding all the geometry and touching no painter or widget. That is a direct response to the rendering-probe lessons in CLAUDE.md: a delegate test can be defeated by a blank render, a pure function cannot. - Tasks 2, 5 and 6 knowingly leave the build red between commits, since removing a column across three files cannot be atomic without one enormous commit. The plan says so at each one and warns against merging mid-plan. Also recorded: the account chip is specified but has no task, because its placement on a card was never specified and inventing one would be a guess.
2026-08-09docs: close the card list's open questions, and record a navigation defectDanilo M.2-3/+126
Both items the spec left open are settled, and one of them turned out to be a defect rather than the addition it was filed as. Item 20 deferred "move between messages without returning to the list" as an addition on top. It is a repair: next_thread and prev_thread are selectRow(current.row() + 1), and a tree numbers rows per parent, so from the last reply of an expanded thread row+1 names a sibling that does not exist and the action silently does nothing. rowCount() with no argument counts top-level threads, compounding it. Recorded as item 60, since it exists on the branch whether or not the card list is built, and it is a fresh instance of the exact rule that branch's own commit message states. The user asked for arrow keys to skip within a thread and Shift+arrows to skip between threads, scoped so the keys still work normally in the message pane, menus and entry bars. Two findings changed the shape of that: - Up/Down need no binding and no code. QTreeView's built-in navigation walks VISIBLE rows, so it already steps into an expanded thread's replies, and being the view's own key handling rather than a shortcut it is inert whenever focus is elsewhere. The requested focus behaviour is automatic. - Arrow keys must never become keymap actions. Every action is a QAction with WindowShortcut, dispatched before the focused widget sees the key, and Qt withholds only plain LETTERS from editable widgets. Return already proved this by breaking the query bar and needing a per-widget ShortcutOverride filter scoped to one widget and one key. Up as a window shortcut would break the query bar, the tag dialog and the web view at once. Shift+Up/Down was rejected for thread-jumping: it is the built-in extend-selection that multi-row tagging and item 20's action scope depend on. Alt+Up/Down instead, verified free across the whole keymap. The way back to a whole thread after clicking a reply is the root card, which is always visible above its replies. Escape is deliberately not overloaded, since it already means clear-selection with clear-pane on Shift+Escape, and a third meaning is the half-an-action problem item 50 exists to fix. The remaining open item is only whether the message pane should change to match, which stays out of scope: this spec is the left pane.
2026-08-09docs: specify the thread pane as a card listDanilo M.2-4/+247
Item 53 recorded that message rows read as a table and left the approach unspecified, with four directions ranging from spanning columns on reply rows to abandoning message rows entirely. The user's answer is wider than all four: the column grid is wrong for the WHOLE left pane, threads included. Threads and replies both become cards in a single column, three lines each, at one uniform height. Sender and date, then the subject with the flag, attachment and reply-count marks inline, then the tag chips. Replies indent by depth with a continuous spine, capped at depth 4. Three decisions worth their reasoning, since each closed an option that looked cheaper: - Uniform height keeps setUniformRowHeights(true), which is the single cheapest property of the design. A blank third line under untagged cards buys constant sizeHint arithmetic everywhere else. - Uncapped indent with a horizontally scrollable pane was asked for and rejected: it reopens item 51 in a worse form. Cards are viewport width, so the pane has no horizontal scroll range at all, and item 51 is resolved for free rather than fought. - A reply's line 3 shows only the tags its thread does not have. The full per-message set was rejected on measurement, not taste: of 48691 messages in the user's database, 7 carry unread and 75 carry flagged, and both are already shown as the sender's weight and the mark on line 2. Everything else is applied per thread and identical on every message in it, so full sets would render blank on nearly every reply and identical chips on the rest. The design is a net removal. ThreadListView::paintEvent, the tag strip's band arithmetic, SubjectDelegate, RowStyleDelegate, the five Column enumerators and the decorative header all go; one CardDelegate paints the whole card. That retires the two bug classes CLAUDE.md documents for the strip, a deleted row cut in half and every other row showing a bare stripe, both of which existed because the strip spanned cells it did not own. The column header was decorative, so a sort dropdown adds a feature rather than replacing one. Two entries only, newest and oldest, passed to notmuch. Sorting by sender or subject would have to happen in the model after results arrive, which fights the batching that makes a 10k-thread query paint immediately. Item 51 is marked resolved by 53 rather than left as separate work.
2026-08-09docs: record items 55 and 58, with their causes correctedDanilo M.1-36/+43
Both backlog entries stated a cause that measurement contradicted, and both would have misled the next reader into fixing the wrong thing. Item 55 blamed the thread view's size hint, computed as the sum of its fixed column widths, and placed the fault on first run. The hint is 256px, not 886: a QTableView does not put its column sum in its size hint, so that mechanism never applied. The trigger is the restore, in a window narrower than the one the position was saved in. Item 58 claimed the zoom range is unenforced and the first render unusable. MessageView::clampZoom() has always enforced exactly the README's 0.5 and 3.0; only the report was missing.
2026-08-09fix(ui): give Archive its own iconDanilo M.1-0/+46
Item 59, reported by the user against 0.12.0. Archive and Mark all read both used `mail-mark-read`, so with the toolbar following a desktop set to icon-only the two buttons were indistinguishable, despite doing different things: archive removes `inbox` from the selection, mark all read removes `unread` from the whole view. Introduced by item 56 in the same session. `archive` had that name from before, when only eight actions carried icons, and item 56 assigned it to `mark_all_read` as well without checking the table for duplicates. `mail-archive` is also the more accurate name, since `mail-mark-read` describes read state rather than archiving. The test asserts the class rather than the reported pair: a hand-written table of twenty-four names has more plausible duplicates in it, so noTwoActionsShareAnIcon compares every action against every other. It compares cacheKey() rather than the theme name, because two different names resolving to the same art are equally ambiguous on screen, and it guards on every action having an icon first, since on a theme that resolves nothing the comparison loop would never run and pass vacuously. Mutation-checked with a different collision. Item 56's own probe is what let this through: it verified every name resolves to non-null art, which is true of two names resolving to the same art. Resolving and being distinguishable are separate properties. The replacement was picked by rendering both at 24px and comparing the images. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09feat(ui): make the toolbar icon size configurableDanilo M.1-0/+34
Follow-up to item 56. With the toolbar now following the desktop's button style, an "icon only" desktop makes the icon the whole control, and this style reports PM_ToolBarIconSize as 16px, which is a small target for a button with no text beside it. A [general] toolbar_icon_size key, 16 to 64, defaulting to 24 rather than to the style's own metric. Setting it to 16 restores the theme's value. Clamped and reported, unlike message_zoom, which documents a 0.5 to 3.0 range in the README and enforces none of it. Both ends here break the UI that would be used to fix them: too small is an invisible icon, too large is a toolbar taller than the window. The unenforced message_zoom range is recorded as item 58 rather than fixed here, since it is a separate defect that predates this change. Also documents in the README that saved-query button labels are the key names from the user's own [queries] section, which is why the "Flagged" button still read that way after the action was renamed: it is a user's query name, not a string this code owns. The sample config now shows `Important = tag:flagged` to teach the wording the UI uses. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09feat(ui): icons on every action, and rename Flag to ImportantDanilo M.1-2/+45
Items 56 and 57, done together because both touch the action registry. 56. The complaint was inconsistency, not absence: eight of twenty-four actions had themed icons, so two adjacent entries in one menu disagreed and the toolbar laid out an empty slot for the other sixteen. The themeIcons table now covers them all. The fifteen names added were probed against a live icon theme first rather than taken from the freedesktop spec on faith, and the existing null-icon guard still lets a theme that lacks one fall back to text. The second half of the note asked that buttons honour the desktop's "Icon only" setting. They could not: the hardcoded setToolButtonStyle overrode it whatever the user had chosen. It now reads SH_ToolButtonStyle. Dropping the call entirely was tried and rejected, since a bare QToolBar defaults to ToolButtonIconOnly rather than to the platform hint, which ignores the setting just as thoroughly the other way. This is a visible change: on a desktop set to "Icon only" the toolbar now shows icons without text. 57. "Important" over "Starred", the user's pick; the Message menu already has "Mark &spam", so "Starred" would have needed an accelerator from inside the word. Changed the action text, its status tip, the undo description and the star column's tooltip, which still read "Flagged". The tag stays `flagged`. It is wire format that neomutt, the user's saved queries and ThreadSummary::isFlagged() all read, and following the label through to the tag would rewrite the mail store and desynchronise every other tool over the same Maildir. The action name stays `flag` too, since that is the key users write in [keys]. Four tests. everyActionCarriesAnIcon names every action missing one and guards against passing on an empty list; it reported all sixteen before the change. theImportantActionStillWritesTheFlaggedTag asserts on the tag the model actually received, and mutating it to `important` fails that test plus two pre-existing held-edit tests. Also adds the changelog entry for the cron-sync indicator fix, which the commit that made it omitted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09docs: record items 56 and 57 from the user's notesDanilo M.1-0/+112
Two notes added since this morning's pass, both presentation. 56: icons are inconsistent across the interface. The mechanism is not missing, it is partial: the themeIcons table covers eight actions and about twenty others get nothing, so adjacent menu entries disagree. The names are not the obstacle either, probed against this desktop's theme and every name a full set would need resolves. The second half of the note, that buttons should honour "Icon only", is a real override: the hardcoded setToolButtonStyle defeats the desktop's own setting. 57: rename the Flag action to Important or Starred. Label only. The notmuch tag stays `flagged`, since it is wire format that neomutt and the user's saved queries also read. The star glyph already ships in the list column. Recorded that "Important" can take a free accelerator while "Starred" collides with Mark &spam. The first draft of 56 claimed there were no icons at all, which was wrong: it missed the table at mainwindow.cpp:902 by grepping for the call site rather than reading the setup. Corrected before commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09docs: record items 54 and 55 from the user's notesDanilo M.1-0/+149
The backlog is downstream of the user's Obsidian notes and had drifted. Three notes had no entry; two became items and one turned out to be a question with an answer already in the tree. 54, a defect: edits applied before a cron sync still counted as pending. The count is cleared only in the local sync-finished handler, so a run the window did not start left the indicator claiming work that had already shipped, and the exit prompt asked to sync for it. Adjacent to item 49, whose account set goes stale the same way. 55: in a window narrower than the thread view's column widths there is no space left for the splitter's stretch factor to distribute, so the message pane collapses to nothing on first run. The third note asked whether a build can skip the tests. It can: QTMAILDIR_BUILD_TESTS=OFF, which the SlackBuild already passes. Causes verified in the code rather than copied from the notes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08docs: carry the item 20 and 53 backlog entries onto masterDanilo M.2-10/+1703
The work for item 20 lives on the branch item-20-message-rows, parked and not merged while the user explores a layout other than the table. Without these documents on master the session-start backlog read would miss item 53 entirely and item 20 would still read as unspecified, so the next session would either re-ask a question already answered or start designing against a rejected design. Docs only. No code from the branch is merged here, and the entries say so in three places: a note above the status table, item 20's own section, and a banner on the plan document telling a future agent not to execute it again. File and line references were checked against master rather than copied. Item 53's citation of the column-grid cause pointed at threadlistmodel.cpp:275-283, which on master is unrelated font handling; it now names the branch and the function instead of a line range that would send a reader to the wrong code. CLAUDE.md and CHANGELOG.md were deliberately NOT brought across. Both describe a QTreeView and features master does not have, and a CLAUDE.md that misdescribes the architecture is worse than one that is merely out of date.
2026-08-07feat(sync): sync only the accounts with unsynced editsDanilo M.1-1/+12
A sync ran mbsync -a regardless of what changed, so tagging mail in one account fetched all of them. The account set was not a parameter anywhere on the path: MailSync::start() took no arguments and the script hardcoded -a, so nothing between a tag edit and mbsync carried which account changed. Track which accounts have edits and pass their mbsync channels through to the script, which now takes channel names and falls back to -a when given none. An empty set means all accounts, per the request: a sync with nothing pending is a fetch, and narrowing that to wherever the last edit landed would quietly stop collecting mail everywhere else. The channel is a new optional per-account key rather than the section key. The two names genuinely diverge, because a QSettings section key may carry dots that the channel does not, and mbsync treats an unknown channel as fatal rather than skipping it, so key-as-channel would fail those accounts' syncs outright rather than degrade. It defaults to the key, so accounts whose two names already agree need no config change. The edited-account set is deliberately not netted the way the pending-edit map is: that map tracks the index, where a tag removed and re-added leaves nothing outstanding, while this tracks the mail store, where both writes have already renamed files that mbsync still has to propagate. It is also snapshotted before flushHeldEdits(), which inserts into it synchronously rather than on a queued reply, so a successful sync cannot clear accounts whose edits it never carried. Closes item 49. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07feat(ui): add a Maildir overview under HelpDanilo M.1-1/+35
Nothing in the UI reported database-level facts: every query gave a thread count for that query, and nothing said how much mail there is overall. A dialog under Help now shows messages, threads and tags from notmuch, plus the account list from config, since notmuch does not model accounts at all. A separate worker call rather than a reuse of requestCounts, which counts threads to match the row count of a query. This counts messages, which is what a user means by "how much mail is in here". The test pins 4 messages in 3 threads against the fixture and fails if they are ever made equal, so routing both through one count cannot pass unnoticed. Every field starts at -1 and renders as "unknown" when notmuch could not answer it. Printing 0 would say the Maildir is empty, and telling someone their mail is gone is the worst way to report an index that failed to open. The dialog opens showing "Counting..." rather than blocking, since counting every message is not free on a large database. That makes two lifetimes matter: the reply can arrive after the dialog is closed, so the label is a QPointer, and the dialog can be closed and reopened while a count runs, so a generation counter drops the older answer. The test drains DeferredDelete before firing the late reply, because close() deletes through deleteLater and without that the dangling case is never actually reached.
2026-08-07feat(ui): make Escape deselect the row as well as blank the paneDanilo M.1-1/+67
Blanking the pane while leaving the row highlighted reads as half an action, and deselecting is what Escape means nearly everywhere else. The user asked for two actions rather than a changed one, so clear_pane keeps its behaviour and moves to Shift+Esc; clear_selection takes Escape and does both. Shift+Esc rather than unbound because every action carries a default and a test enforces it. Clearing the selection re-adopts the thread it just cleared, unless done in exactly the right way. clearSelection() leaves currentIndex() valid, so onSelectionChanged takes its "one or fewer rows" branch, sees a current row whose id differs from m_currentThreadId, and calls onThreadSelected for it. Clearing the selection before blanking lets that run while the id still matches, so nothing reloads, and clearing current stops a later collapse-to-one-row reaching the same row. All four arrangements were tried; only this one passes. The first version of the test could not distinguish any of them. It asserted showingPlaceholder(), which passes regardless because this fixture has no worker, so loadThread never replies and the pane is never repainted. currentThreadId() and currentIndex() are observable without one, and asserting those is what made the test discriminate.
2026-08-07test: pin the offscreen platform, and let the popup test check its own geometryDanilo M.1-1/+30
ctest sets no QT_QPA_PLATFORM, so the suite's verdict depended on how it was invoked: green for anyone exporting `offscreen` by hand, red under ctest in the same tree. That cost a wrong diagnosis before the cause was found, an unrelated change blamed for a failure that reproduces on a clean checkout. The Wayland warning blames a missing transientParent, which is misleading. Instrumenting the test showed the popup viewport arriving as 1278x0. The zero height is why the grab returned a null pixmap, but the width is the worse half: this test sizes a line edit to 550px and exists to prove a description survives a popup that size, so a working grab would have measured a popup twice that wide and passed while proving nothing. Offscreen gives 548x40, the geometry the test means. Pinning the platform is therefore the correct fix rather than an opt-out. It is set in add_qtmaildir_test so it covers every test, including the two others that create widgets, and anything added later. The test now also asserts its own geometry, since CMake only governs ctest and the binary is often run directly. A bare !shot.isNull() said nothing useful; it now reports "popup viewport has no height (1278x0)" or names a popup too wide to be the case under test. Both guards were verified by mutation.
2026-08-07docs: record four items the usage notes had and the backlog did notDanilo M.1-0/+168
The notes are the upstream source and keep growing, so the backlog goes stale on its own between sessions. This pass found three unrecorded entries, each with its cause verified in the code rather than copied from the note: - 49, sync always runs every account regardless of what changed. The account set is not a parameter anywhere on the path, and the shipped script hardcodes the whole-store sweep. Needs a decision first about whether an account key is also an mbsync channel name. - 50, Esc blanks the pane but leaves the row selected. Built as specified by item 32; the user now wants both, as two actions rather than one. - 51, clicking a subject scrolls the list sideways. Ordinary view auto-scroll, cosmetic. 52 came from the work itself rather than from the notes: the suite's verdict depends on how it is invoked. test_querycompleter grabs a popup and Wayland refuses a grabbing popup for a window that has never received input, so it fails under ctest and passes when run with the offscreen platform by hand. It cost a wrong diagnosis on the day it was found, an unrelated change blamed for a failure that reproduces on a clean checkout, because the comparison was run under two different plugins. Recorded with the transientParent fix preferred over forcing the platform, since a test that runs under the real plugin is worth more than one that opts out.
2026-08-07feat(ui): fill the blank message pane with a branded placeholderDanilo M.1-1/+83
An empty right pane said nothing, and multi-select made it a routine sight. It now carries the wordmark, thread counts that run their query when clicked, and a sync line that appears only when something needs attention. Rendered into the existing web view as a third document shape, so there is one document path and one set of security rules. The brand palette is a deliberate exception to deriving colours from the desktop theme, since a logo is brand rather than chrome; the theme still picks which of the two sets is used. Counts refresh when the pane is about to show rather than in the background: one goes stale the moment a tag is edited, and refreshing one nobody is looking at is work for nothing. A generation counter discards a superseded reply, and a late answer cannot repaint over an opened thread. The helper lines are real links because JavaScript is off in this profile. The handler is gated on the placeholder actually being displayed, so the same URL inside a message body is dropped: a stranger's mail must not drive the thread list, even to run a harmless query. Three defects found while building, all silent: - Every CSS percentage was invalid. QString::arg does not collapse "%%" into "%", so the document carried "50%%" and the browser dropped each declaration holding one, disabling the mask, the glow and both radial gradients while still rendering something plausible. Substitution is by named token now, which cannot collide with a percent sign. - A geometry probe endorsed the layout while that was live, because it measured only properties without percentages. - The font test passed against a build with one face missing, since the other satisfied both of its checks on its own. The mockup's light values needed correcting against a real pane: the grid vanished at a 2% luminance step on white, and the glow subtracts light there rather than adding it, washing the pane. Strength only, not hue.
2026-08-07docs: record what item 30 was specified asDanilo M.1-0/+51
The blank-pane item was designed with the user this session but not built, and the decisions would otherwise have to be re-derived. The important correction is to the item's own source material: it is built from the user's HTML mockups, not from the PNGs this section originally recorded. Those PNGs were rendered from that HTML, and it ships a complete brand palette for both light and dark. Two parts of the mockup cannot survive the port, and both are deliberate properties of this application rather than problems to fix: its Google Fonts import is blocked by the interceptor, and its layout script cannot run because JavaScript is off. Also records that the selected-thread count, which this section called the half with real value, was rejected by the user on the grounds that the status bar already shows it. The helpers are unread, flagged and inbox counts plus a sync line that appears only when something needs attention. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07feat(ui): show each thread's tags under its rowDanilo M.1-25/+98
The thread list was uniform and cramped: every row one line tall, with nothing to say what a thread was about before opening it. Rows are now roughly double height, carrying a strip of tag chips beneath the text, with alternating row colours and a star column for flagged threads beside the existing paperclip. The strip is painted by the VIEW rather than by a delegate, which is why ThreadListView exists. A delegate is handed one cell's rectangle and cannot paint outside its column, so a strip drawn from the subject column stops at that column's edge, losing the last tags of a well-tagged thread, and starts at its left edge, putting the chips under the subject instead of under the row. Tags the row already shows another way are left out: inbox as structure, unread as the dimming, flagged as the star, attachment as the paperclip, and the account as the chip in the subject cell. Sorted, since notmuch's order is not guaranteed stable and a row whose chips reordered between repaints would flicker. Six defects were introduced and fixed on the way here, all of them one consequence: a QTableView paints per cell, and a row-wide strip is not a cell. SubjectDelegate installed view-wide drew the account chip into every column, since AccountLabelRole belongs to the row; it is split into RowStyleDelegate for every column and SubjectDelegate for the subject alone, with a Q_ASSERT guarding that. Row height returned from sizeHint did nothing, because a table takes one height per row. The strip painted from x=0 over the marker columns, via a protected viewportMargins() that returns 0. Measuring the text band and the strip with one font put the pills over the date. Alternating colours and the selection are per-cell too, so the band showed bare viewport background until the view filled it, honouring the model's own BackgroundRole first so a deleted row is not cut in half. And that fill spanned the full width, cutting the centred marker glyphs at their midpoint. Closes item 5. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>