diff options
| author | Danilo M. <danix@danix.xyz> | 2026-10-31 12:49:53 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Danilo M. <danix@danix.xyz> | 2026-10-31 12:49:53 +0100 |
| commit | c7d09a3956c2b32f9590651c2088ab34334ac538 (patch) | |
| tree | e7fdf1cc55ecfe836981ad770315e9c6d832958d /tests/test_composecontext.cpp | |
| parent | 2b6ecd2a1f624c12c071320ff1ed96404d75f839 (diff) | |
| download | qtmaildir-c7d09a3956c2b32f9590651c2088ab34334ac538.tar.gz qtmaildir-c7d09a3956c2b32f9590651c2088ab34334ac538.zip | |
docs: record rule apply and archive-on-arrival
The no-confirmation rule gains its second exception, by property: a write
scoped to the whole index confirms with the count, though it can be undone.
AGENTS.md and the spec now describe the backfill as built: the worker
resolves the ids once, writes one tag at a time over that fixed list, and
answers with a single ruleApplied from which the undo macro is built, with
nothing armed on the shared confirmation queue. Apply is refused during a
sync.
Hand round trip, throwaway index of 2 messages (one from the promo
sender), rules.json written by TagRules::save from the C++ side with
allow_archive and a note: post-new exited 0 and logged "applied 1
rule(s)"; after it, tag:promo 1, tag:inbox 1, tag:promo and tag:inbox 0,
tag:unread 2, tag:new 0. The file read back 1 rule with allow_archive
True and note "kept".
Italian translations for the 16 new strings; lrelease reports 725
finished, 0 unfinished.
Items 212 and 213 closed. Item 214 opened: an undo's write is not armed,
so its confirmation is credited to whatever command is waiting.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/test_composecontext.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions