feat(panes): draw the pane marks from shipped SVGs, not font glyphs

Items 70 and 69, the second folded into the first as item 70's own size note
predicted it should be.

The panes drew their state marks as font glyphs: U+1F4CE for an attachment and
U+2605 for a flagged thread, each with a fallback for a font that cannot render
it. Both fell back to "*", so on such a font a flagged thread and one carrying
an attachment were indistinguishable, which is a defect the fallback introduced
rather than prevented. What a mark looks like was also the desktop's decision
rather than this application's, and the panes are exactly where it should not
be: the user asked for the toolbar and menus to keep following their icon theme
while the panes stop.

Six marks now ship in assets/icons/marks/: flagged, attachment, passed, replied
and the two expander triangles. QIcon::fromTheme still resolves every toolbar
and menu icon and was not touched.

Licensing chose the shapes. The look came from a GPL3 icon theme, and this
project is GPLv2-only, which are incompatible: GPLv2's "no further
restrictions" clause bars shipping GPL3 assets in a v2-only work. The six were
drawn fresh in the same idiom instead, with no path data copied. The idiom is
generic: solid single-path silhouettes at 16x16 with no strokes.

They are compiled in as string literals rather than loaded from a .qrc.
src/CMakeLists.txt already records why resources belong to the executable: a
qrc in the static library registers itself from a global initialiser the linker
drops. The tests link the library, so a resource-based mark would be missing
exactly where it needs asserting. assets/icons/marks/ stays the editable
source.

One asset serves both palettes. Every payload paints with fill="currentColor",
which QSvgRenderer renders black rather than resolving, so Marks::pixmap
composites the wanted colour with CompositionMode_SourceIn. A mark then takes
the card's own pen colour and follows selection and the read/unread dimming
without a second variant to keep in step.

CardLayout reserves a rect per mark and CardDelegate paints into it. The marks
were glyphs inside the subject STRING, so their width came free from the text
metrics; as icons the geometry has to know they are there or the subject runs
underneath them. The expander pill had the same trap, its triangle being a
glyph in expanderLabel(), and now reserves that width explicitly.

Item 69's part: passed and replied were words in the tag strip and are marks
beside the subject now. The message pane's header carries the flagged and
attachment marks next to the subject, per the user's decision that the right
pane needs those two and only outside the message area.

A duplicate that no test caught is worth recording. Every geometry assertion
passed while a card showed passed as BOTH an arrow and a green tag chip: the
chip filter had no reason to know a mark had appeared. It was found by
rendering real cards to an image and looking at them. isDrawnAsAMark() is now
one list consulted by both PillTagsRole and MessageOwnTagsRole, since two
copies drifting apart is how a tag ends up drawn twice on one row and not at
all on another.

Fourteen tests: nine in test_marks, four in test_cardlayout, one in
test_threadlistmodel. Mutation-checked at four points, each failing a test: the
subject ignoring the marks, the flag not indenting the subject, the pill
forgetting the triangle's width, and the recolour composite removed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions